Taipei Times (1)--Hau says it's time to go - 環境保育討論

Hau says it's time to go

By Chiu Yu-Tzu
STAFF REPORTER
Friday, Oct 03, 2003,Page 2
The Environmental Protection Administration (EPA) head, Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌),
yesterday reiterated his resolution to step down because of his differences wit
h the rest of the Cabinet on the referendum issue.

Meanwhile, local residents opposing projects to build incinerators demand a ref
erendum as a tool to halt what they call "inappropriate" development projects.


Hau yesterday morning inspected the EPA's Bureau of Environmental Inspection in
Taichung as scheduled, encouraging staff to continue their work without his le
adership.

Hau said the only reason for his resignation was the lack of common ground with
the Cabinet on the referendum issue.

"It's regrettable to see my professional opinions have been misinterpreted," Ha
u said to his administration colleagues.

Hau said he had achieved much in the last two and half years, such as dealing w
ith local opposition on issues such as incinerators, cleaning up rivers and lim
iting the use of plastic shopping bags and disposable cutlery.

"It's time to say good-bye," Hau said firmly.

Hau said he would not get involved in any political activity in the near future
and did not intend to serve in the Cabinet after May 20 next year.

His decision received strong support from his father, former Premier Hau Pei-ts
un (郝伯村).

"It's quite normal for a government administrative official in a democratic cou
ntry to resign if he shares no common point of view toward the implementation o
f policies," Hau Pei-tsun told the media camped outside his house.

Due to the resolution to protect the environment, EPA head Hau suggested last w
eek that a public development project, of which the environmental impact assess
ment (EIA) had already been passed, should be exempted from the application of
a proposed referendum law currently drafted by the Cabinet.

If not, Hau argued, the referendum would trigger a series of environmental cata
strophes.

Hau's argument, however, has been criticized by environmentalists, who said exi
sting assessment systems reflects corruption, and not professionalism.

Sam Lin (林聖崇) of the Ecology Conservation Alliance said EIA committee member
s did not conduct their evaluations carefully, as they only read information co
ntained in EIA reports produced by advisory companies authorized by developers.


Sometimes, Lin said, they pass assessments without conducting any field inspect
ions.

"So how can we believe Hau when he says that environmental protection could be
ensured by the approval of EIAs?" Lin said.

Because of the lack of public participation in the EIA Act, environmental oppos
ition became common in Taiwan after the law came into effect.


--