恆春地震 - 正斷層 ? - 地球科學討論
By Leila
at 2006-12-27T12:29
at 2006-12-27T12:29
Table of Contents
※ 引述《LibertyBell (May it be.....)》之銘言:
: http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/eq_depot/2006/eq_061226_wtai/neic_wtai_hrv.html
: http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/eq_depot/2006/eq_061226_wtai/neic_wtai_q.html
: USGS 和 Harvard 的解很明顯的都是正斷層
: 隱沒帶正斷層地震?
: 第二個餘震解出來好像是走向滑移為主有正斷層分量
: 這個位置有什麼造成正斷層的可能因素?
Some secondary structures..
I think the Chaochou Fault is one of the possibilities, since the southern
part of this fault alreay presents the normal fault feature on the surface
However, these earthquakes locate in the west of the fault, we need more
evidences to know where is the source.
--
: http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/eq_depot/2006/eq_061226_wtai/neic_wtai_hrv.html
: http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/eq_depot/2006/eq_061226_wtai/neic_wtai_q.html
: USGS 和 Harvard 的解很明顯的都是正斷層
: 隱沒帶正斷層地震?
: 第二個餘震解出來好像是走向滑移為主有正斷層分量
: 這個位置有什麼造成正斷層的可能因素?
Some secondary structures..
I think the Chaochou Fault is one of the possibilities, since the southern
part of this fault alreay presents the normal fault feature on the surface
However, these earthquakes locate in the west of the fault, we need more
evidences to know where is the source.
--
Tags:
地球科學
All Comments
By Christine
at 2006-12-28T08:24
at 2006-12-28T08:24
By John
at 2006-12-29T04:18
at 2006-12-29T04:18
By Michael
at 2006-12-30T00:13
at 2006-12-30T00:13
By Audriana
at 2006-12-30T20:10
at 2006-12-30T20:10
By Agnes
at 2006-12-31T16:05
at 2006-12-31T16:05
By Lucy
at 2007-01-01T12:00
at 2007-01-01T12:00
By Susan
at 2007-01-02T07:54
at 2007-01-02T07:54
Related Posts
恆春地震 - 正斷層 ?
By Lucy
at 2006-12-27T11:42
at 2006-12-27T11:42
2006/12/26 22:53:19.7 - 小區域 M5.2
By Vanessa
at 2006-12-26T23:50
at 2006-12-26T23:50
半夜12.30??
By Olivia
at 2006-12-26T23:08
at 2006-12-26T23:08
2006/12/26 20:40:25.5 - 第95108號 M5.2
By Oscar
at 2006-12-26T22:41
at 2006-12-26T22:41
2006/12/26 20:34:21.1 - 第95107號 M6.4
By Jack
at 2006-12-26T21:38
at 2006-12-26T21:38