碳補償 VS 出軌補償 - 颱風討論

By Hedda
at 2009-12-04T10:10
at 2009-12-04T10:10
Table of Contents
推 orion :碳排放總量應該是不變的吧 12/04 01:02
→ orion :只是富國可以從窮國買到碳排放量,跟你的例子不同 12/04 01:03
→ orion :要減碳,減總排放量就可以 12/04 01:03
→ orion :你的例子裡總出軌數不是固定的 12/04 01:04
→ justin210559:或許我沒有表達的很好~希望樓上大大可以看看影片 12/04 01:26
舉個例子
若今天有兩個國家A和B
A是所謂已開發國 排碳量C=150
B是所謂開發中或未開發國家 排碳量C=50
(此時總碳量為C=200)
假若碳排放量超過C=120則必須交付超出量乘上$1K的錢給所謂的某些公司
(兩國規定總排碳量為C=240)
也就是A國必須交$30K給該公司
該公司則將錢給B國種樹減碳
記住 重點是種樹減碳去平衡多排的碳 (效用多大還是個問題)
並不是真正跟B國買C=30的排碳量 (就算真要限制我想也限制不住)
未來B國繼續發展到C=120時 兩國總碳量就已經達到C=270
已比原先規定的兩國C=240還多
若B國要繼續發展 就再拿錢去給該公司給另一個國家種樹補償
這樣只是陷入一個無窮迴圈
碳補償其實就是種"有錢是老大"的心態
有著"我只要花錢就可以不用去管這排碳規定"
這樣並不會讓花錢的國家有心去減碳 而只想花錢買排碳量
如有邏輯不太對的地方歡迎提出討論.
--
Tags:
颱風
All Comments

By Kyle
at 2009-12-04T18:25
at 2009-12-04T18:25

By Suhail Hany
at 2009-12-05T02:39
at 2009-12-05T02:39

By Eartha
at 2009-12-05T10:54
at 2009-12-05T10:54

By Regina
at 2009-12-05T19:09
at 2009-12-05T19:09

By Selena
at 2009-12-06T03:23
at 2009-12-06T03:23

By Rosalind
at 2009-12-06T11:38
at 2009-12-06T11:38

By Mia
at 2009-12-06T19:52
at 2009-12-06T19:52

By Liam
at 2009-12-07T04:07
at 2009-12-07T04:07

By Edith
at 2009-12-07T12:22
at 2009-12-07T12:22

By Dinah
at 2009-12-07T20:36
at 2009-12-07T20:36

By Leila
at 2009-12-08T04:51
at 2009-12-08T04:51

By Ophelia
at 2009-12-08T13:06
at 2009-12-08T13:06

By Andrew
at 2009-12-08T21:20
at 2009-12-08T21:20

By Bennie
at 2009-12-09T05:35
at 2009-12-09T05:35

By Catherine
at 2009-12-09T13:50
at 2009-12-09T13:50

By Kyle
at 2009-12-09T22:04
at 2009-12-09T22:04

By Sarah
at 2009-12-10T06:19
at 2009-12-10T06:19

By Necoo
at 2009-12-10T14:33
at 2009-12-10T14:33
Related Posts
碳補償 VS 出軌補償

By John
at 2009-12-03T22:43
at 2009-12-03T22:43
俄羅斯8.1度 破百年高溫紀錄

By Daph Bay
at 2009-12-03T14:47
at 2009-12-03T14:47
冷氣團南下 周日前一天比一天冷

By Hazel
at 2009-12-03T09:56
at 2009-12-03T09:56
天氣概況~2009/12/03~冷氣團報到~

By Hazel
at 2009-12-03T09:50
at 2009-12-03T09:50
還要冷3天! 週日下探13℃

By Suhail Hany
at 2009-12-02T23:14
at 2009-12-02T23:14