隕石有能量? 中研院:騙人的啦 - 地球科學討論
By Anthony
at 2007-10-17T23:04
at 2007-10-17T23:04
Table of Contents
老闆傍晚才被TVBS採訪, 沒想到晚上就馬上上新聞, 記者們的效率還滿高的..
大家在信仰坊間能量學說的同時, 該好好檢視業者們的說法, 哪些是唬爛與邏輯不通的
偽科學...
==============================================================================
http://tw.news.yahoo.com/article/url/d/a/071017/8/mjmq.html
隕石有能量? 中研院:騙人的啦
隕石能量水到底有沒有根據,中央研究院地球科學研究所研究員強調,隕石就是石頭根本
沒有能量,何況在沒有任何變化的情況下,能量也不可能轉換到水中儲存,所謂能量水的
說法是無稽之談。
隕石到底有什麼神奇能量,旅遊過164個國家的眭澔平,拿出一顆顆黑色石頭,認為只要
握住隕石,手指頭似乎特別有力量,還拿出三用電表測試。旅遊作家眭澔平:「這些電阻
數它達到幾百到1千多,這是可以通過高壓電的。」
隕石的能量顯示在儀器上嗎?中研院研究員說沒關係啦。中央研究院研究員沈君山:「用
電阻來代表它的能量,錯嘛,因為真正的能量來自於三用電錶當中的電池嘛。」
不管是這顆來自墨西哥的隕石,或是另外一顆鐵隕石表面都有焦灼的痕跡,地科所強調,
隕石頂多在外太空遭到輻射、帶有輻射,但絕對沒有能量,更別說要把能量轉換到水中。
沈君山:「很斬釘截鐵的跟各位講,石頭就是石頭沒有能量,如果水能夠產生什麼反應,
儲存能量的話,那我們就不需要電池了嘛。」
隕石能量礦泉水,看在科學家的眼中根本是無稽之談,一瓶所謂隕石能量礦泉水竟然賣到
200元結論是不可思議。
--
不管黑貓白貓,只要會叫nia的就是好貓~
--
Tags:
地球科學
All Comments
By Agnes
at 2007-10-20T07:32
at 2007-10-20T07:32
By Xanthe
at 2007-10-22T15:59
at 2007-10-22T15:59
By Eden
at 2007-10-25T00:27
at 2007-10-25T00:27
By Zora
at 2007-10-27T08:54
at 2007-10-27T08:54
By Carolina Franco
at 2007-10-29T17:21
at 2007-10-29T17:21
By Emma
at 2007-11-01T01:49
at 2007-11-01T01:49
By Olivia
at 2007-11-03T10:16
at 2007-11-03T10:16
By Regina
at 2007-11-05T18:44
at 2007-11-05T18:44
By Charlie
at 2007-11-08T03:11
at 2007-11-08T03:11
By Isabella
at 2007-11-10T11:39
at 2007-11-10T11:39
By Megan
at 2007-11-12T20:06
at 2007-11-12T20:06
By Leila
at 2007-11-15T04:33
at 2007-11-15T04:33
By Carolina Franco
at 2007-11-17T13:01
at 2007-11-17T13:01
By Faithe
at 2007-11-19T21:28
at 2007-11-19T21:28
By Lydia
at 2007-11-22T05:56
at 2007-11-22T05:56
By Bethany
at 2007-11-24T14:23
at 2007-11-24T14:23
By Tristan Cohan
at 2007-11-26T22:50
at 2007-11-26T22:50
By Franklin
at 2007-11-29T07:18
at 2007-11-29T07:18
By Lydia
at 2007-12-01T15:45
at 2007-12-01T15:45
By Sandy
at 2007-12-04T00:13
at 2007-12-04T00:13
By Michael
at 2007-12-06T08:40
at 2007-12-06T08:40
By Jacky
at 2007-12-08T17:08
at 2007-12-08T17:08
By Callum
at 2007-12-11T01:35
at 2007-12-11T01:35
By Harry
at 2007-12-13T10:02
at 2007-12-13T10:02
By Robert
at 2007-12-15T18:30
at 2007-12-15T18:30
By Franklin
at 2007-12-18T02:57
at 2007-12-18T02:57
By Steve
at 2007-12-20T11:25
at 2007-12-20T11:25
By Robert
at 2007-12-22T19:52
at 2007-12-22T19:52
Related Posts
160ma是幾年?
By Sarah
at 2007-10-05T13:55
at 2007-10-05T13:55
國科會 2007秋季展望系列演講 (10/5~12/28)
By Megan
at 2007-10-02T21:33
at 2007-10-02T21:33
牛頓雜誌要復刊了
By Enid
at 2007-10-02T12:49
at 2007-10-02T12:49
有關整個地球史濃縮成一年的問題
By Audriana
at 2007-10-01T23:48
at 2007-10-01T23:48
有關整個地球史濃縮成一年的問題
By Thomas
at 2007-10-01T22:29
at 2007-10-01T22:29